Moreland proposed a planning law amendment, C183, however a State-appointed independent planning panel determined council had not adequately conducted surveys and parking plans to understand the consequences of this change. Do you support this proposal to change planning laws that would allow developers to build Zero Car Parking developments in Activity Centres without requiring a planning permit? 

I oppose Zero Parking developments and our lead candidate, Sue Bolton, has consistently voted against Zero Parking developments on Council. Zero Parking developments should have to go through a planning permit process with the community having notification and objection rights, so that they have a chance to say whether such a development is appropriate or not.


Some of the problems with Zero Parking developments is that there are no parking bays for residents moving furniture in and out, for tradespeople doing work on the units or for health or home care workers visiting people in the units to provide care.

Another issue with Zero Parking developments is that some residents might move in thinking that they will never need a car, but then have a change in their live such as getting a job on the outskirts of Melbourne or become a shift worker, or have an accident so they can’t get around on a bike temporarily or permanently.

A tribunal revealed that a recent Zero Car Parking development in Moreland had 7-9 cars secretly parked on the street. In order to trust these developments, residents need to better understand their impact on local amenity. Are you willing to support an urgent survey of existing Zero Parking developments, to ascertain their impact on parking in adjacent streets?

I support a survey.

The Zero Parking amendment, C183, failed in part because it did not follow the Planning Minister’s guidelines – the need to conduct parking surveys and understand impact on local amenity, and local input. Would you support that the parking restrictions are not rolled out until the parking survey work is completed, so that the use and needs of proposed restricted areas are better understood?

Yes. I support a delay until the survey is completed. 

The Moreland Integrated Transport Strategy introduces strict 2hr blanket 8am-8pm parking restrictions across much of Moreland. 2P restrictions Moreland-wide have never been debated in Council Meetings, or had any community consultation. Do you support these Parking Restriction Zones, and would you be open to restrictions going through community consultation for co-design?

 Support for Consultation. 

Many residents feel that the needs of Glenroy, are different to the needs of Brunswick, are different to the needs of Coburg. Do you believe in the idea of one parking plan across all of Moreland, or that areas should be evaluated based on their local usage and needs?

Yes needs could differ, support evaluation . 

One of the central tenets of MITS is that people ‘choose to drive’, and council should make it difficult and expensive to use a car in Moreland, to discourage car use. Do you think this approach is the best way to discourage car use, or are you open to a less punitive approach?

Reduction in car usage is critical, however I do not support punitive approaches which only penalise those who can least afford it.

Zero Parking developments were constructed and approved on the premise that residents would not impact on local street amenity. This changed in Feb 2020, when council approved ‘Permit A’, which will allow these developments to buy an on-street parking permit. Do you commit to restricting all zero parking developments from obtaining ‘Permit A’?

Yes

Given the level of community concern, including our own petition of 1200 signatories, and disregard for the views expressed in community consultations, do you commit to redrafting MITS and the parking restrictions, with an eye to rebuilding the strategy with better community engagement? (Y/N)

Yes

 

 

Authorised by Marion Leigh. PO Box 47, Pascoe Vale South, 3044.